IN “THE GOD WITHIN” Mike Adams exposes the false philosophy of modern science and the seeming unconsciousness of Stephen Hawking. It explains why science is rooted in evil and destruction while harming life on our planet: GMOs, vaccines, psychiatric drugs, nuclear weapons—they’ve all been pursued and promoted under the brand of “science.” And yet, shockingly, modern scientists do not believe humans are conscious beings. They claim we are all just “biological robots” which provides the philosophical pretext for genocide…
“Recent experiments in neuroscience support the view that it is our physical brain, following the known laws of science, that determines our actions, and not
some agency that exists outside those laws.”—Stephen Hawking

![]()
“All that we know is nothing, we are merely crammed wastepaper baskets, unless
we are in touch with that which laughs at all our knowing.”—D H Lawrence
![]()
Which one of the two characters above do you think has the better understanding of the nature of reality, consciousness, the universe… ourselves? Which one should we be listening to—the woman or the robot which, with its unique blend of naivety and arrogance, claims to be on the verge of completing a “Theory of Everything”?
More: NaturalNews.TV | See also: The Case for Intelligent Design | Nobody is Smarter Than You Are


Also of interest:


Stephen Hawking as a bad guy and a ROBOT??? You people are most ignorant… The man has motor neuron disease.. cannot move.. and has done more for the human race than you lazy shits on your laptops.. Calling him robot and cyborg is completely inappropriate and shows that you have no basis to your claim.
Also, scientists built the computer your working on, the internet, routers, blah blah blah.. You say science is bad yet you use the tools of science.. Maybe you’re too dumb to see the fault in that argument.
All science does is try to bring the truth to light.. If you can’t handle the heat get out the kitchen son!!
No one is saying Hawking is ‘bad’. No one is saying science is ‘bad’.
As for ‘robot’—Hawking uses the word to describe human beings—so Steve essentially considers himself to be a bio-mechanical machine. That’s the whole point of this article.
Incidentally, I’d be interested to hear what you feel Hawking has done ‘for the human race’—how 7 billion people have benefited from his ideas or his unqualified sermonizing. At all.
..compared to the potentially catastrophic damage his misguiding influence will have on humanity—if we continue to listen to him.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, sir. And you appear to have it in spades…
Well put. Stephen Hawking obviously needs to get out more!
He obviously wants to keep us in the dark about our true nature, potential and purpose – because he’s lonely in there by himself. It’s ironic when a man in a wheelchair, with a synthetic voice, insists we’re all soulless robots!
I have nothing against cyborg Hawking sharing his conspicuous lack of right-brain development with the rest of us, but I do object to the pontificating that goes with it. His blinkered views are the product of our exclusively left-brain education system.
The joke, of course, is that Stephen is applying his own consciousness (something he dismisses) to disproving the role of consciousness—like a fish arguing against the reality of water!
Stephen Hawing: the Ptolemy of our time.
Thanks, David, and good for Mike to point out “the philosophical pretext for genocide”, and why drug manufacturers, eg, don’t really care whether their products kill people or not. The point is to make money, and live the good life, and let the cattle be consigned to their fate. Which is the karma they are accruing to themselves…